We are a top law firm known for delivering consistently high-quality legal services across nearly every major area of law.
Who We Are
Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, SAN & Co. is a powerhouse of professional legal experts and result-oriented workforce that are tailored to deliver valuable legal solutions across all industries.
Meet the Team
Our firm is renowned for combining deep legal expertise with broader insights to handle complex cases, disputes, and regulatory challenges.
Practice Areas
Ours is "the absolute go to firm" for anything complex and time sensitive, a reputation born of deep bench strength and a unified culture of excellence.
Go To Pro Bono
Our Principal's corner is filled with educative and interesting knowledge-based sections that grant you access to his interviews, public lectures, articles while keeping you informed of the law and your legal right.
ExploreEbun-Olu Adegboruwa, SAN & Company is a dynamic Law firm of astute legal practitioners experienced in different fields of the Nigerian legal system.
Our firm is recognized for delivering forward thinking legal counsel, combining modern approaches with local insight to help clients seize business opportunities and navigate change with confidence. Sector expertise is central to our success.
Our lawyers possess deep knowledge of the industries in which our clients operate, enabling us to provide comprehensive advice grounded in real world understanding. For our clients, this translates into service enriched with an added dimension of value.
Our firm provides proactive, expert guidance on rights, responsibilities, and liabilities, helping you navigate contracts, reduce risks, and maintain compliance. Whether you’re growing an SME, safeguarding intellectual property, or resolving disputes, our tailored counsels deliver the clarity and confidence needed to make sound legal decisions.
We are renowned for providing clients with valuable solutions to intricate business and legal issues across various areas covering sectors such as banking & finance, intellectual property, tax, real estate, foreign investment, labour law, mergers and acquisitions etc...
We are a top law firm known for delivering consistently high-quality legal services across nearly every major area of law.
![]() |
Learned Expression
6th October, 2026 Coastal highway of pains and gains (2)The Geo-Political and Localized Devastation: The Ondo State Realignment A major geographical and legal controversy has emerged regarding the Ondo State section of the highway, where the Federal Ministry of Works altered the original route. The Inland Diversion (Bypassing the Coast) Local stakeholder groups, backed by institutional frameworks like the pan-Yoruba group Afenifere and the Ilaje Committee of Lawyers, the Itsekiri and Iwere Groups, traditional rulers and opinion moulders have raised alarm over the realignment that diverts the highway inland through parts of Edo State, bypassing Ondo’s approximately 100-kilometer coastline. This is not a matter to be dismissed with a wave of the hand, as the federal government seems to be doing apparently, given the grave but ominous silence that has characterised the response to these basic agitations. No one should lose sight of the original concept of the Coastal Highway project, going by its name and design. Let us take from one of the sound arguments propounded by those concerned which is hereunder adapted and reproduced. A road is never merely a road when properly conceived and strategically aligned. A major highway can transform communities, open markets, create employment, stimulate investment, connect previously isolated populations and redefine the economic destiny of an entire region. A project conceived as a Coastal Highway should not, without compelling and demonstrable reasons, substantially bypass the coastal communities of Ondo State. That is why the controversy surrounding the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway and the reported alteration of its alignment in Ondo State deserves more than political commentary. It deserves facts, transparency, professional scrutiny and responsible public engagement. It’s an issue of National significance The first point that must be established is that this is not merely an Ilaje issue, the matter transcends Ilaje. It is an Ondo State issue, a Niger Delta issue, a national development issue and ultimately an issue of equitable infrastructure planning. The agitation must not be reduced to a local or sectional demand. Ilaje is an integral part of Ondo State, and its coastal communities form an important component of Nigeria’s Atlantic and Niger Delta environment. Its extensive coastline, waterways, fishing communities, maritime activities and proximity to the Atlantic Ocean place it at the heart of the State’s enormous blue-economy potential. Consequently, when a major Federal infrastructure project intended to traverse and connect Nigeria’s coastal belt allegedly bypasses substantial portions of that coastline, it is entirely legitimate for communities that appear to fall outside a proposed alignment to ask: Why? Those questions should not be dismissed as agitation for political reasons. And where the explanation is based upon technical considerations, they deserve technical answers, economic answers and policy answers. These questions should not be regarded as hostility. They are the natural questions of citizens whose communities may be materially affected by a major public infrastructure decision. The straightforward fundamental question to ask is, what makes a Coastal Highway “coastal”? Is it merely a highway that eventually connects coastal cities? Or is it intended to create a strategic transportation corridor that opens up, integrates and stimulates development along Nigeria’s coastal belt? The central issue is remarkably simple. If the project is described and conceived as a Coastal Highway, then the relationship between the highway and Nigeria’s actual coastline becomes an important matter of public policy. If the latter is also the objective, then the economic and developmental significance of the Ondo coastline cannot reasonably be ignored. The coastal communities of Ilaje should not merely watch a Coastal Highway pass somewhere inland while they remain disconnected from the transformational opportunities such infrastructure is expected to create. A coastal highway should create more than asphalt. It should create economic corridors, employment, logistics opportunities, tourism, maritime connectivity, industrial development, fisheries expansion, aquaculture, agricultural value chains and access to markets. That is precisely why the alignment matters. I acknowledge the reported explanation that the Ondo coastal alignment presents soil and geotechnical challenges. There is nothing unreasonable about engineering considerations influencing the alignment of a major highway. Indeed, any responsible government must consider soil bearing capacity; geotechnical stability; environmental impact; flooding and erosion; construction cost; maintenance requirements; bridges and hydraulic structures; security; traffic projections; economic viability; and long-term sustainability. However, the existence of an engineering challenge does not automatically establish that the only solution is to abandon the coastal alignment. The challenges should lead to a careful assessment of available engineering solutions and alternatives. It should not automatically end the conversation. The question is not whether the terrain is challenging. The question is whether the challenges can be responsibly engineered, at what cost, and with what long-term benefit to Nigeria. That is a question for qualified engineers, environmental experts, economists, planners and other relevant professionals. And that is precisely why the matter deserves a transparent technical conversation. If the terrain is the reason for the deviation, Nigerians should be able to see the technical basis for that decision. What are the geotechnical findings? What alternative routes were investigated? What are the comparative construction costs? What are the environmental implications? What is the projected economic benefit of each alignment? What is the long-term maintenance cost? And what additional infrastructure would be required to connect the bypassed coastal communities? These are not hostile questions. They are legitimate questions in a democracy concerning a major public infrastructure project. The coastal environment is undoubtedly challenging. But engineering challenges should invite engineering solutions. The argument that a terrain is difficult should be approached with the question, “How can it be engineered?” And not “How can it be avoided?” Modern engineering has demonstrated that infrastructure can be constructed across difficult terrains, wetlands, riverine environments, mangrove ecosystems and areas with complex soil conditions. This does not mean that every proposed coastal alignment is automatically feasible or economically sensible. Rather, it means that the technical feasibility of the Ondo coastline deserves a rigorous and independent assessment before it is effectively written off. The people of Ilaje know their environment. Engineers understand science. Government possesses the institutional capacity. Let all three knowledge systems meet at the table. The approximately 100-kilometre coastline attributed to Ondo State is an enormous economic asset, not a geographical burden and should not be viewed merely as difficult terrain or considered only in terms of the difficulty it may pose to construction. It should also be considered in terms of the avalanche opportunities and the enormous potential such as: Blue Economy; Fisheries; Aquaculture; Maritime Transportation; Tourism; Ports and Tourism; Logistics; Energy; Agriculture; Industrial Development; Coastal Trade and many others. The Nigerian Federal Government is increasingly seeking to diversify its economy and expand its blue economy potential. A strategically planned coastal infrastructure corridor could therefore become much more than a transportation project. It could become an economic development corridor. That possibility deserves serious consideration. It therefore becomes even more important that the infrastructure connecting Nigeria’s coastal corridor should be planned with the economic potential of these communities in mind. A road through the area could become the catalyst for an entirely new economic ecosystem. The fact that communication infrastructure traversed portions of these environments during the colonial era, and that major infrastructure has subsequently been developed in comparable coastal environments across Nigeria, reinforces the need for serious technical investigation rather than assumptions about impossibility. The issue is not whether modern engineering can defeat nature. Rather, it is whether the cost, engineering requirements and long-term benefits justify the investment. That is a question capable of being answered objectively.” The equal development question The development of Edo State, Delta State and Ondo State should be complementary, and I have no objection whatsoever to the development of any other part of Nigeria. Ilaje like every other Nigerian community deserves infrastructural development. Development should never be presented as a competition between Nigerian states. The objective should be to create interconnected economic corridors in which one state’s development reinforces another’s. Therefore, the argument should not be “Ondo versus Edo.” It should be “How can Nigeria obtain the greatest developmental benefit from the entire coastal corridor?” That is the higher national question. Constructive engagement is not and should never be seen as rebellion. The reported visit of the Honourable Minister of Works to Igbokoda is therefore commendable. A government that engages directly with affected communities demonstrates democratic responsiveness. The next logical step should be deeper technical and stakeholder engagement. The “Real Coastal” Necessity Legally and economically, bypassing the actual coastline defeats the project’s primary statutory objectives. The original route was designated to open up neglected, oil-producing littoral communities in the Ilaje local government area. It was meant to link strategic economic frontiers like Araromi Beach (a major eco-tourism hub) directly to Lagos and the South-South. The Legal Argument for Invalidation Bypassing these communities violates the core equity principles of the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) Act and infrastructure development mandates. While the Ministry of Works defended the alteration by citing severe “soil challenges” and coastal terrain issues, legal analysts and marine engineering experts argue that modern civil engineering has tamed similar terrains globally. Forcing an inland path strips the Ilaje people of their right to infrastructural inclusion, turning a generation-defining “coastal” highway into a standard mainland expansion that abandons the very communities anchoring Nigeria’s maritime economy. |
![]() |
30th April, 2026 Constitution amendment: What NASS has done is mere tokenism -AdegboruwaA member of the Lagos Judicial Panel on Police Brutality during the #EndSARS protest, rights activist and Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Mr Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa speaks to DARE ADEKANMBI on the ongoing constitution amendment by the National Assembly, the presidential materials on offer and 2023 elections. The National Assembly members accepted some robust proposals concerning ongoing efforts at amending the 1999 Constitution. Are you happy about some of the accepted recommendations? I am not [happy] in any way at all. Why? What the National Assembly has done is mere tokenism. It is just scratching the surface of the real issues plaguing our country. We are not running a federation. It is unitary system of government that we have currently. It is not correct to just be handing over bits and pieces to the states, regions and local government councils, as if there is no equality of status. Power should go down to the owners, that is, the states, local government and the regions. The Federal Government has no business holding on to all the issues and items that bring money to the federation. The Federal Government should just be an administrative centre. So, all the things they voted upon have no relevance to our demand for true federalism. The APC, when it was canvassing for votes in 2015, promised devolution of powers and what we understood by that is that there will be resource control first. The regions that have the natural resources within their domains will be allowed considerable freedom. Osun and Zamfara states should be able to mine their gold; Ondo should be able to mine its oil and Oyo State should be allowed to take care of its cocoa, gold and everything that is there. The same thing should apply to the North where the northerners should be allowed the control of their natural resources and they pay royalty to the centre. None of these things has been tackled at all by the National Assembly. All this window-dressing of reforms does not make any impact on our demand for true federalism. Our lawmakers should summon the courage to address the yearnings of Nigerians so that the country can move forward. There reason there is corruption is that there is too much money at the federal level for which nothing is being done, no projects are being executed. Give the money to the owners so that people can take their destinies into their own hands and move the country forward. What the National Assembly is doing is not acceptable at all. Why can't we have state police? Who is scared? Look at the success of Amotekun in the South-West. Who is scared? But some Nigerians have applauded the removal of VAT from Exclusive List to the Concurrent List for states to also have power over this tax? That is why I called it tokenism. VAT is a value added tax, a product of certain events in terms of sales, commerce and consumption. Those are just paltry things. The main resource of the country is what each region has as an advantage. There is no reason for the Federal Government to be sitting on that. That is the core issue behind the clamour for devolution of power, resource control and independence for the states. What is the Fedral Government doing by legislating central admission to schools and education of children when our youths are suffering, no universities to admit them. Lawyers graduate from universities and can't go to law school because there is a central system of controlling those who get admission into law school. For God's sake, in 21 century? Why can't Rivers State build its own law school and all its citizens who graduate from its own university can go there and be trained? Why can't Lagos, Kano and other states have their own law schools? That is what is happening in the United States, United Kingdom and other jurisdictions. Why will children be writing a common examination called UTME in order to secure admission to universities and they are frustrating them every day. They said some states are educationally disadvantaged and somebody who passes on merit is asked to be on the waiting line for somebody who did not pass. In what sane society do you see such a thing? Do you see this tokenistic attempt, to use your phraseology, as a prelude to the clamour for restructuring because electricity, railway and other items are now on the Concurrent List? But this is not what the government promised us. I want to emphasise that when APC was canvassing for votes in order to displace the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), APC entered into a social contract with Nigerians for total devolution of powers by amending the constitution or writing a new constitution. In demonstration of that, the party set up a committee headed by the Kaduna State governor, Nasir el-Rufai on restructuring. Where is the report? Why are they scratching the surface? They know what Nigerians want which is restructuring and which was why we voted them into power. Why is APC chickening out now? That is the point I am making. There is no need for us to be dancing around and be doing a prelude. Let's go into the main action and let Nigeria move forward. Do you see the current National Assembly summoning the courage to go the whole hog of bringing about the fundamental changes required in the law for the good governance of the country? It is not about whether they have the courage, but whether they can continue like this for another time. There are so many of these people in the parliament in Abuja who can no longer go to their constituencies either for reason of insurgency, kidnapping or the poverty that has enveloped their constituencies. Many of them are sojourners in Abuja who are unable to relate with the people who voted for them. How long can they continue to pretend? This is what is at the core of the crisis in the country. No employment, mass poverty, no infrastructure and it is all because of corruption. The Federal Government is sitting on all the goldmine that makes this country Nigeria and somebody will sit in Abuja and be doing portfolio oil well and be selling oil through telephone. This is what is making Nigeria not to go forward. That is why we are saying we can't be scratching this thing on the surface and be giving us tokens. We want to go to the meat of the matter. Let there be true federalism or those who make peaceful change impossible will make violent change inevitable. This system will consume the parliamentarians themselves if they don't take the courage to do the needful. It is not about conducting elections in 2023. We must define the basis of our federalism. We must address the fundamental issue of resource management, political power. Let's go back to the Uwais Panel report. Let's go back to the 2014 National Conference report. Let's go back to the el-Rufai report. Why are they hiding these things? It is wickedness on the part of our leaders. If they don't summon the courage to do the needful, many of them will be swallowed over time by the crisis that they have imposed on the rest of us. Another general election is 11 months away. Do you see any fundamental change in the way Nigerians will vote? I think that what we have advocated is that the constitution recognizes zoning in Section 14 of the constitution which talks about not allowing a particular ethnic group or a particular set of people to be in dominance. You saw how it played out recently when the Minister of Education was asked at a press conference the reason for sustaining the cut off mark in Unity Schools and not allow merit to its place in admission to Unity Schools that belong to the federation. He said it is because of federal character which is being implemented to ensure that states which don't have enough students are allowed to be lifted above the rest. So, federal character is being implemented in favour of those particular states. Then, federal character should be implemented for political power. Otherwise, there is injustice. You can't be implementing the constitution to favour you in the areas where you have disadvantage and then you refuse to implement it in the areas where others have and want advantage. It will not be fair. It will not be fair if the region that has produced the president from 2015 to 2023 to still be contesting for the presidency. This will add to the crisis in the land. If you agree on a particular position for a particular region at a particular time, then you should let it cut across. So, the first thing is that there must be zoning. The president in 2023 should come from the Southern part of the country, whether it is South-East, South-South or South-West. That will be when we will know we are running a federation. If for any reason, either due to population or rigging or any misappropriation of political power, the presidency goes back to the same region where President Muhammadu Buhari comes from, then we will know there is no country. Democracy and election are numbers game. If the North votes more than we do in the South, then it means they will be right to have it. Then, education should also be by merit. If children sit for an examination and the only people that pass are from the South, then let them get admitted into all the schools in the country. Admission should also be by merit. If we want to use merit, let it be general. But they can't be implanting federal character to their own advantage and then sit on it when it comes to the turn of others. That is what I am saying. If you have population as an advantage and you want to be using it, then you must concede to those who have intellect as well so that when you take the benefit, you also take your own burden. Do you foresee a likely shift in paradigm in the way Southerners will vote in 2023 because the Northerners seem to have this huge political consciousness at election and this appears absent in the South? This is the reason we are Nigeria. It is possible for a particular section to have a consciousness in a particular area as their own advantage, just the same way in the South, here there is consciousness for education. Every average Southerner wants to go to school. It is possible that the average person in the North wants to go to the army or wants to go and collect PVC. Everybody has his own advantage. That is why we came together to say unity in progress. So, you can't use your consciousness for political power to dominate others who have consciousness for other things and you are not allowing them to use their consciousness to their advantage. So, it makes no sense to say because the Northerners have political consciousness, that puts them at an advantage to be ruling us forever. Other people have consciousness for other things and that consciousness has not enabled them to dominate those who don't have the consciousness. So, we are asking for a level-playing field. We can't claim that because of those who have consciousness to collect PVC to go and vote, others should wait forever. A number of people have been offering themselves as presidential materials, crisscrossing the country on consultations. When you look at those on the field now, any hope of a messiah emerging from among them? I honestly think our focus should be the system that will produce these people because once the system is proper, the constitution is properly drafted and the institutions are strengthened, it will be immaterial who gets to power. Everything [Donald] Trump did to frustrate the American election, the institutions of the country overpowered him because the system had been arranged to function at its optimal level. So, whether the individuals who are indicating to be president now have the capacity and understanding is really a function of the system that will produce them. My focus won't be on the individuals, but to ensure we structure our system in such a way that whoever emerges will follow the trend that Nigerians have outlined for their own prosperity. That is my own understanding. Once the system is right, whosever comes up, must fall in line. So, we need to amend the constitution properly in such a way that it will guarantee common prosperity for the common good of the peoples of Nigeria, ensure that the rule of impunity is arrested, see that the fundamental rights of people are guaranteed, ensure there is press freedom and liberty for the courts. Once these things are taken care of, an individual will not be able to manipulate us. In other words, you don't see age as a factor? Well, age is a factor, no doubt, and I believe so. For instance, President Buhari himself admitted that much of his handicap came by reason of his age. So, given our medical system and our environment, the elderly are at disadvantage in Nigeria unlike in the United States where you see 70 years old people still ruling in power because their system functions very well. Life expectancy is higher and the environment is conducive to be able to allow our healthcare system to take care of the ageing people. It is not the same in Nigeria. So, in that regard, I believe age is also important. This particular government brought the idea not-too-young to rule in encouraging younger people to get to power. So, it should stick to its own policy. |
We can help you make critical decisions using our legal framework and valuable experience in legal matters. A one-on-one guidance with our experts will highlight your key issues, common initiatives and help you achieve your mission-critical priorities.
Lagos
Lekki Law Center
'Kogun Chambers, Jesus Arena'
Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa SAN & Co.,
Plot 1, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa Lane
Itedo/Freedom Way,
Lekki Phase 1,
Lagos, Nigeria.
08033016673, 08033246500, 08100000758
info@adegboruwalaw.com, adegboruwalaw@yahoo.com
Abuja
Abuja Law Center
No. 12 Winston Churchill Street,
Asokoro,
FCT, Abuja,
Nigeria.
08033016673, 08033246500, 08100000759
info@adegboruwalaw.com, adegboruwalaw@yahoo.com
Copyright © All rights reserved | MAIL

